Greetings fellow evaluators! My name is Shannon Hitchcock, PhD (she/her/hers) (aje.managingeditor@gmail.com), and I am a quantitative sociologist, public health evaluator, and, since February 2023, the Managing Editor of the American Journal of Evaluation. I am here to discuss the peer review process. The content of this blog post is based on a presentation given by …
Greetings, and welcome to AEA365’s week of posts dedicated to the American Journal of Evaluation (AJE). We are Rodney Hopson & Laura Peck, both long-time AEA members and just installed in October 2023 as AJE’s Co-Editors-in-Chief for 2023-2026, covering what will be AJE volumes 45, 46, and 47. Our vision for the American Journal of …
In 2019, Sharon, Natalie, and I (The ARCHES Evaluation Team) held a series of meetings that focused on developing and implementing the ARCHES Collaborative Diagnostic Tool (ACDT). It was decided that this tool would be used in a multi-year pilot with the Tulare-Kings College and Career Collaborative (TKCCC). The focus of this effort was to implement the ACDT with the goals of testing and refining the language, validating and calibrating outcome indicators, clarifying roles for collaboration, developing data visualizations, and developing protocols that support the collaborative analysis of data.
In spring of 2018, Sharon, Natalie, and I (ARCHES Evaluation Team) began to examine the insights gained from juxtaposing the Self-Assessment Survey with the Outcome Indicators of the ARCHES Logic Model. The Self-Assessment Survey was initially created as a reflective instrument for clients to independently gauge their progress. However, the Outcome Indicators, identified through the comparative analysis, were diagnostic by nature. These indicators were intended to inform how ARCHES could tailor its support for a collaborative’s development via its Just in Time Service Model.
The Evaluation Teams’ work in 2017 also intersected with the development of an evaluation design. In a previous evaluation effort, ARCHES had developed a self-assessment survey tool that was used to document the development of intersegmental collaboratives. From this tool a list of indicators was developed and comparatively analyzed to outcome indicators listed in the logic model. This process resulted in a refined set of outcome indicators that served as the foundation for developing an evaluation design for ARCHES. As the lead evaluator, I developed an initial draft of the Evaluation design and presented it to Sharon and Natalie in January of 2018. They were tasked with peer editing the document which would be finalized and approved by March 2018.
In 2005, The Alliance for Regional Collaboration to Heighten Educational Success (ARCHES) was established in California as a statewide voluntary confederation of regional collaboratives. Over the years, it provided technical assistance to alliance members. In 2016, ARCHES decided to refocus its services. Sharon Twitty (Executive Director, ARCHES) and I have worked to respond to this new charge by helping to develop evaluation products and systems that support the work of the Regional Intersegmental Collaboratives.
Hi folks, my name is Caitlin Showalter—I am a Technical Advisor in Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning with the Palladium Group and based in eastern North Carolina. This was my first year attending the AEA conference, and what an impressive gathering of minds, stories, and hopes for the future of evaluation! I presented as part of a group of panelists to discuss evaluation in global health programs, representing the USAID-funded Data for Impact (D4I) project and our work on the Second Periodic Assessment of USAID’s Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Strategy (MSNS).
My name is Svetlana Negroustoueva and I lead Evaluation Function in CGIAR, an agriculture research for development organization.
And my name is John Gargani. I’m a former AEA President and a member of CGIAR’s Evaluation Reference Group.
What is Research for Development?
Research for development (R4D) is scientific research undertaken to improve the lives of people and the environment. Often, it produces innovations with the potential to create transformational impacts. When evaluating research for development, two domains must be addressed: the quality of science and development impacts. We describe how this is done at CGIAR, which recently published a new framework for evaluating R4D.
Hi, my name is Soledad Muniz. I am the Director of Programmes at InsightShare, a
not-for-profit based in the UK championing the use of Participatory Video combined
with the Most Significant Change technique (PV MSC) for participatory monitoring and
evaluation. In 23 years, we have worked in over 70 countries on more than 500 projects worldwide.
I am Dr (Mrs) Rooba Moorghen, former Hubert Humphrey Fellow, and former Permanent Secretary. As a government practitioner in Mauritius, I have acquired more than forty-five years of experience in public sector Management, Public Administration and Public Policy. In the context of the 2023 American Evaluation Association (AEA) Conference valuing stories, I find it befitting …
