Hello! I’m Andrew Nelson, a medical student at the Keck School of Medicine of USC and Lead Student Director of the Keck Online Learning Initiative (KOLI). We are a student-run organization dedicated to the creation of curriculum-based, online supplemental study material for medical students. When my colleagues started KOLI in 2015, they wanted to build an organization that was designed not only to last, but to improve. Doing so involved invoking methods of program design and evaluative thinking that, despite our collective years in higher education, were mysteries to us. However, thanks to outstanding support and advising from our mentor, Dr. Anne Vo, we have developed a model for a student-run peer education organization that we believe will support continuous learning and improvement.
Hot Tip #1: Create a logic model in which each stakeholder has a clearly defined role.
It is important in any organization for every member to know their responsibilities. This is especially true when the members are busy medical students and faculty members. In KOLI, member roles change every year as students matriculate and graduate. As such, it is crucial for the longevity of the organization that new leaders understand the roles that they are undertaking.
We used a combination of resources to facilitate discussions on these topics. The chapter on “How Do You ‘Understand’ the Program?” in Evaluation Essentials: From A to Z (2nd Edition) offered accessible and insightful tips for creating a logic model. Kara Crohn’s work on process mapping has also been influential.
Hot Tip #2: Foster positive relationships with faculty and administration.
Our organization would not exist without the administration’s buy-in, and we would not have content without our faculty educators. By demonstrating the utility and popularity of our study tool to the administration and sharing our program design in various administrative and academic venues, we have received increased resources and faculty support. Developing relationships with faculty has allowed us to tailor our content towards the most important information.
Curriculum Committee Meetings and 1-on-1 meetings with faculty and administration have been very productive and constructive spaces for us to share our work. So, too, have local and regional medical education conferences (e.g., Innovations in Medical Education Conference, AAMC’s Western Group on Educational Affairs Meeting).
Hot Tip #3: Reflect – evaluate and re-evaluate the outcomes you want to measure.
Because we provide a curriculum-based resource, our initial outcome of interest was users’ curriculum exam performance. However, in our discussions at AEA 2018, we were advised to also consider users’ long-term outcomes, such as development of self-directed learning skills later in their medical education. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s work on the PDSA cycle has been a cornerstone resource for us in the program design and implementation phases. Thanks to this kind of thinking, we anticipate that it will continue to be a helpful resource as we move forward on this charge.
The American Evaluation Association is celebrating Health Professions Education Evaluation and Research (HPEER) TIG Week with our colleagues in the Health Professions Education Evaluation and Research Topical Interest Group. The contributions all this week to aea365 come from our HPEER TIG members. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to email@example.com. aea365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators.