My name is Denise Long, MS, BHS, OT, Doctor of Education Candidate in organizational leadership/development and adjunct faculty at Southern Illinois University. Over the last 6 years, I’ve studied, written, and worked in the areas of trauma-informed care (TIC), resilience, evaluation, and anti-racism. My dissertation research focuses on executive leadership of institutional racial equity. As a health care practitioner and trainer about trauma-informed practices and racial equity, I advocate that the heart of TIC work must be rooted in the potential to help people heal from the past and humanize the systems that serve us. This blog post and resources will address the healing-centered nature of equity-focused trauma-informed care and evaluators’ role in facilitating healing.
Healing and Equity Are Not Optional in TIC
The healing-centered perspective of TIC and trauma-informed evaluation is radical. It is a complete paradigm shift. Firstly, it suggests that all health and human service systems should and must change to redress (rather than merely serve) the adverse developmental experiences and historical traumas of people. Secondly, the explicit naming of racism and historical trauma (anti-Black racism in particular) defies our national narrative about how to value the past. In this, the healing-centered perspective challenges how to qualify present day citizens’ responsibilities, given the ubiquitous benefits from historical oppression and enslavement. Thirdly, it affirms that evaluators have a responsibility to advocate for changes in the practices of health and human service programs. A practitioner of any kind cannot be “trauma-informed” without including what is needed to heal the harm that has been caused and prevent future trauma from occurring. These calls to action can create discomfort in both the evaluator and the evaluation client.
Evaluating the Impact of Un/Readiness and/or In/Ability
Racial healing is often stalled because of resistance and fragility toward addressing difficult topics. In Using a Principles?Focused Evaluation Approach to Evaluate Coalitions and Collaboratives Working Toward Equity and Social Justice, Susan Wolfe, Kyrah Brown and I clarified that equity-focused efforts must not cater to discomfort about discussing racism and inequity. Instead, we suggest that evaluators must assess the impact discomfort has on the people served, program implementers, and program outcomes. To focus on healing as an outcome, trauma-informed evaluation must account for the impact of program stakeholders’ relative in/ability and/or un/readiness to confront and correct inequitable dynamics. Evaluators’ ability to facilitate healing requires us to create and implement processes that represent un/readiness and in/ability, quantitatively and qualitatively. Building capacity to facilitate healing requires evaluators to also engage in a journey of healing our traumas. This includes acknowledging and repairing the ways adversities and historical traumas have shaped our identities and equity-supporting consciousness.
Become a change agent by understanding and healing personal and collective trauma.
The Future of Healing: Shifting From Trauma-informed Care to Healing Centered Engagement by Shawn Ginwright Ph.D.
FIE TIG Week: Can Evaluation Touch Your Heart? Trauma-Informed and Healing-Centered Practice…and Feminism by Allison Shurilla and Vidhya Shanker
This week, AEA365 is hosting Trauma-informed Eval Week during which blog authors share lessons from and principles of trauma-informed evaluation. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to email@example.com. aea365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators.