Hello, I’m Jack Tebes, Professor at the Yale School of Medicine and a faculty at YaleEVAL, an evaluation group of The Consultation Center at Yale, where I am Executive Director. Equity and social justice are central to our mission at the Center, so this week my YaleEVAL colleagues and I are continuing the dialogue on how participatory evaluation approaches can be used to promote equity.
As evaluators, promoting equity is an AEA guiding principle for contributing to the common good toward a just society. Specifically, we must seek to: balance the interests of stakeholders toward the goal of social justice; minimize historic inequities or disadvantage to mitigate power imbalances, bias, and privilege; and share data in such a way that doing so furthers transparency, access, and confidentiality. Recognizing and dismantling racism, sexism, ableism, heterosexism, classism, and other lived experiences of systemic biases and oppression must be centered in our evaluation thinking and practice if we as a society are to achieve equity.
To center equity in our work requires that we make a series of inter-connected choices as evaluators, choices that we can frame as questions to ask ourselves.
- Do I use reflective practice, the careful consideration of my own observations and experiences, to examine my privilege, biases, and power?
- If not, how can I learn that skill and use it honestly and without defensiveness?
- If I do use reflective practice, do I have the cultural humility to acknowledge that I may not be the right person or the only person to serve as evaluator?
- Can I step back and use my privilege and power as an evaluator to foster a more equitable and participatory evaluation process that centers underrepresented voices?
- As a co-evaluator with others, how can I remain committed to a participatory process despite specific deliverables and strict timelines?
- How do I remain committed to equity and the shared use of data and dissemination of findings once an evaluation ends?
As these questions illustrate, equity in evaluation is not something that is simply addressed in a group training exercise, a reading or handout, or even through individual reflection, as useful as these may be. Equity in evaluation, especially through participatory approaches, needs to be a choice during each step of an evaluation in the context of real-world constraints. It must be centered in what we do as evaluators. By embedding equity into each choice an evaluator makes, it is more likely to be realized, however imperfectly. This week, my YaleEVAL colleagues and I will blog each day about promoting equity through participatory approaches. We hope you join us and we welcome your feedback and ideas.
Lessons learned: Center equity into each choice an evaluator makes.
Rad resource: Reflective practice is a foundational skill that fosters learning, problem-solving, and growth by identifying implicit assumptions and underlying patterns for ourselves and others. In addition to the above link, check out: Demystifying reflective practice by Smith et al.
The American Evaluation Association is hosting Promoting Equity Through Participatory Evaluation Approaches Week. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to email@example.com . aea365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators. The views and opinions expressed on the AEA365 blog are solely those of the original authors and other contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the American Evaluation Association, and/or any/all contributors to this site.