LAWG Week: Leveraging Collective Agency: Empowering Stakeholders to Address Housing Issues in the Mississippi Delta by Olivia Melvin, Monica L. Coleman, and Moira A. Ragan

Greetings, AEA365 readers! Liz DiLuzio here, Lead Curator of the blog. To whet our appetites for this year’s conference in beautiful New Orleans, this week’s posts come to us from the feature the perspectives of the Gulf Coast Eval Network (GCEval) members, where the uniqueness of doing evaluation in the gulf south will be on display. Happy reading!


Hello, everyone, from a small part of our evaluation team at the University of Mississippi Center for Research EvaluationOlivia Melvin, native Mississippian and project coordinator on regional and international ed- and health-related projects; Monica Coleman, native Mississippian and doctoral candidate in Counselor Education and Supervision; and Moira Ragan, senior evaluation associate and psychometrician by trade. We’re facilitating our first empowerment evaluation as a direct response to the prominence of disempowerment evaluation in mainstream practices.

We have spent some time this year reflecting on the historic, and sometimes pervasive, distrust of research/evaluation in rural, low-income areas in Mississippi borne of failed interventions and the perception of outsiders’ performative empathy. In response, we’re exploring empowerment evaluation as a means of leveraging pre-existing—and often unrecognized—agency in local communities. 

We’re starting with a longstanding relationship between one of our team members and a community development organization in the MS Delta, focusing on addressing housing issues—both lack of access to affordable housing and lack of available housing options, overall. Empowerment evaluation is an ideal method for this work because of its focus on inclusion and ownership among stakeholders. What better topic to encourage buy-in and ownership of the planning, development and evaluation processes than in addressing home ownership?

Rad Resource

We will be adapting Fetterman’s virtual empowerment evaluation toolkit to conduct a hands-on, in-person workshop series. In partnership with the coalition, we will also be providing virtual resources and avenues for feedback to allow the inclusion of those who may not be able to join us in-person. Our goal is to create a space where all interested stakeholders can participate in capacity building for evaluation and strategic planning. 

Our current plan for recruitment targets financial and real-estate professionals, current and former educators, healthcare providers, political figures, community residents and all interested parties. We are still in the planning stages of this process and appreciate any and all feedback from our peers in the evaluation community. 

Hot Tips? We don’t have any yet, so let’s hear yours!

A few discussion questions for those of you who have completed similar projects: 

  • Who would you outline as being key stakeholders in this conversation? What variety of community roles would need to be present (or invited at the very least) to not perpetuate exclusionary community development planning? 
  • How do you increase buy-in for change-making without overpromising potential outcomes of the process? 
    • For example: It is crucial to involve the voices of unhoused people in the community. However, we cannot guarantee that the efforts of this year-long empowerment workshop series will result in short-term infrastructural change in these individuals’ lives. 
  • For evaluators who have conducted empowerment evaluations, what types of roles have you served in these settings (i.e., peer mentor, back-up support, resource provider)? 
    • As evaluators at a university-based center, we have access to many academic resources that the general public does not. How do we work around the barrier of paywalls? 

Please keep the discussion going in the comments so we can learn from each how to better engage and empower evaluation stakeholders!


We’re looking forward to the Evaluation 2022 conference all this week with our colleagues in the Local Arrangements Working Group (LAWG). Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this AEA365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the AEA365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to contribute to AEA365? Review the contribution guidelines and send your draft post to AEA365@eval.org. The views and opinions expressed on the AEA365 blog are solely those of the original authors and other contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the American Evaluation Association, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

1 thought on “LAWG Week: Leveraging Collective Agency: Empowering Stakeholders to Address Housing Issues in the Mississippi Delta by Olivia Melvin, Monica L. Coleman, and Moira A. Ragan”

  1. Hi
    This sounds wonderful! I will try and add my two cents and respond to some of your questions above.

    Key stakeholders: I think you have most of the key stakeholders invited. Have you included faith-based leaders? They are critical.

    Increase buy-in but not overpromise: My response is just to be honest. Let them know you can not promise anything but you can help the entire community if they work together. Some may get access to housing, others will learn about the process, others may simply learn how the process of working together produces additional outcomes. They can use the same approach to access other resources and accomplish other objectives.

    What type of roles have you served: I tend to serve primarily as a coach, critical friend, and facilitator. I work closely in the community with folks who want to learn how to evaluate their own programs. I invite them to facilitate with me. I often lead at first, then have them lead (and I am there to back them up), and over time have them lead (with me there or not there at all – just available to prepare them and conduct a post-meeting review).

    Concerning technology you already know I tend to use technology that is aligned with empowerment evaluation principles, e.g. easy to use, free or inexpensive, does not discourage people from changing their minds and ratings (as they learn about new evidence), and so on.

    I hope these brief comments are helpful. Best wishes.

    – David

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.