My name is Christina Peterson. Shortly after starting my first semester as a PhD student at the University of Tennessee, I had an opportunity to participate in an evaluation project as a data collector. It was just the type of experience I felt I needed to establish myself as an emerging evaluator in my community. Instead, it ended up being a lesson on establishing my ethical boundaries. Fortunately, the faculty in my department had provided the Rad Resources I needed to navigate this situation early in my PhD career.
Researcher Journal. Reflexivity is a critical evaluator competency. During my first semester, we were required to start a reflexivity journal to explore our growth as evaluators. The first exercise was to write about our personal ethics in conducting evaluation. I found clarity in the key words from this statement: self-determination, transparency, and autonomy. I described how it was important to me that people were respected and had a voice in the evaluation protocol. Because of the journal, I was also able to reflect back on the two major themes that emerged from my entries about this situation: integrity and social justice.
AEA Guiding Principles. The concerns I saw emerging in my journal are addressed explicitly in the Guiding Principles of the American Evaluation Association. Two principles provided the direction I needed to make a decision about moving forward with the data collection: integrity/honesty and respect for people. One of my concerns about the project was that the poorly constructed survey items would provide misleading information about the population. Furthermore, since there was no clear purpose for the data collection and the survey protocol did not include informed consent, I was not confident that this work would maximize benefit and reduce unnecessary harm to the community.
Mentorship. Although I felt confident that I needed to let go of this opportunity, there was a lingering feeling of self-doubt. Who was I to question the survey protocol of a professor? What did I know about conducting field research? The AEA Guiding Principles provided direction, but is that how evaluation really works in practice? For the answer, I turned to a faculty member who I knew had talked openly in class about making similar ethical choices as a novice researcher. She reassured me that this protocol was not business as usual in field research and we discussed the courses of action I could consider.
Later that evening, I notified the lead researcher that I could not continue my participation in the data collection and, in line with the AEA Guiding Principles and my personal ethics, I was transparent about my concerns. These Rad Resources were essential to my development as an ethical evaluator.
Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to firstname.lastname@example.org. aea365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators.