Welcome to aea365! Please take a moment to review our new community guidelines. Learn More.

Angela Fitzgerald on Engaging the Community – an Evaluator’s Perspective

Hello! My name is Angela Fitzgerald and I am a Senior Researcher with the National Council on Crime and Delinquency (NCCD: www.nccdglobal.org) – a nonprofit that works to promote just and humane social systems. I have been involved in and have witnessed evaluation work from a number of vantage points, and a challenge that seems to consistently plague organizations is engaging community members (one subset of stakeholders) in the evaluation process. Engaging community members in the evaluation process helps to ensure that evaluation content is understood and of relevance to that audience, identifies advocates who can champion the projects being evaluated, and lends credibility to evaluation findings. I have compiled and listed a few ‘Lessons Learned’ to help organizations overcome the challenge of engaging community members.

Lessons Learned: Develop relationships with community organizations and groups. People are more likely to invest time in something with which they are already familiar or belong. For an organization undertaking an evaluation project, this may require connecting to other organizations or groups to which your desired audience belongs. Developing relationships with other community-based organizations or groups creates ambassadors who are willing to help recruit individuals on your behalf to participate in the evaluation.

Make the process accessible. Engaging community members may require a different process than engaging other types of stakeholders. For example, community members who want to be involved may not be available during the work day. Providing opportunities for engagement through different mediums (web-based, telephone, in-person) and during non-traditional work hours will help to maximize opportunities for individuals to become involved in the evaluation process. Also taking into consideration potential barriers to engagement for community members and working to overcome them (e.g., scheduling meetings in locations that are accessible via public transportation) signifies that you care about their involvement.

Follow-up with your audience after the evaluation is complete. Completing a proper evaluation takes much time and effort, and once completed it’s easy to move on to the next project before sharing findings with your community member stakeholders. Those who have been engaged will be interested in knowing the outcome of the evaluation, and possibly contributing to future work. Make sure to share evaluation findings with community members, and allow them to provide their input in the interpretation of findings. This exchange may be supremely important in defining next steps for the project, as well as ensuring that these community members will want to invest time on your future projects.

Rad Resources: Check out the Center for Disease Control’s (CDCs) website for more helpful information on engaging stakeholders in your evaluation.

Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to aea365@eval.org . aea365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators.

1 thought on “Angela Fitzgerald on Engaging the Community – an Evaluator’s Perspective”

  1. Pingback: WE Week: Rodney Hopson and Sonya Horsford on “But can you do it” questions of evaluator credibility and organizational capacity: Rodney Hopson and Sonya Horsford on the nuances of evaluator credibility · AEA365

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.