Welcome to aea365! Please take a moment to review our new community guidelines. Learn More.

GSNE Week: Alana Kinarsky on The Benefits of a Pop Up Journal Club for Evaluators

 Hello! My name is Alana Kinarsky, a PhD student in the Evaluation program at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). As a graduate student, I regularly read evaluation theory and conduct my own research on evaluation. However, I often wonder how research on evaluation does or should help practitioners in their daily work.

Cool Trick: To connect research and practice, I organized a pop-up journal club during my summer internship at Informing Change. The journal club gave staff an opportunity to read and discuss evaluation research. I circulated a few theory papers via email and the group elected to read “Evaluation and Organizational Learning: Past, Present, and Future” by Rosalie Torres and Hallie Preskill. The following week, about 10 of us got together over pizza for a facilitated yet casual conversation. Discussing theory can help evaluation practitioners meaningfully reflect on their practice

Lesson Learned 1: Theory offers practitioners a framework and context for their evaluation work. As our conversation of the paper unfolded, we zeroed in on a question that weighs heavily in both theory and practice: what is the role of the evaluator? As people around the table began talking through different roles, I noticed their ideas began to align with the Evaluation Theory Tree developed by Marv Alkin and Tina Christie. I sketched it on the board and walked through the different “branches” of evaluation theory.   The Theory Tree focused our conversation and grounded some of these theoretical elements–like the role of an evaluator–in a visual that was analogous to the roles the Informing Change practitioners recognized in their work.

Lesson Learned 2: These conversations are an opportunity for teambuilding. A conversation about theory creates an opportunity for people from different backgrounds and leadership levels to participate in a shared dialogue. During our discussion, we shared personal stories, current challenges, and ideas for future team conversations rose to the surface. Furthermore, people who rarely work together had the opportunity to collaborate and brainstorm with peers.

Lesson Learned 3: Reflection on practice is important. Our work as evaluators is often fast paced so it is easy to get caught up in execution. However, it is important to make time to reflect on the big picture and think creatively. This not only improves an individual’s practice, but also supports organizational learning.

At the end of the hour, I asked the group to quickly share one takeaway from our conversation. The room was buzzing with energy as people shared what they learned and expressed enthusiasm for continuing this practice. The group agreed that stepping away from their desks to talk about theory offered them an opportunity to reflect, build relationships, and generate new ideas.

AEA is celebrating GSNE Week with our colleagues in the Graduate Student and New Evaluators AEA Topical Interest Group. The contributions all this week to aea365 come from our GSNE TIG members. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to aea365@eval.org. aea365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators.

2 thoughts on “GSNE Week: Alana Kinarsky on The Benefits of a Pop Up Journal Club for Evaluators”

  1. Dear Alana,

    Great article. I think this is valuable. I wonder if there is a way in which this can be done online. That is, pop-up journal club. I think that there are two benefits from reviewing journals as a group of peers in the same profession. The first is that we can come to a common understanding of theoretical content, or debate it’s use in different settings.

    The second is that through relating theory with practice, new research/practitioner commentary will develop that could spawn insights (either for the AEA blog) that will aid action research.

    How do you think we can do this?


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.