Have you ever wondered how to ensure your monitoring and evaluation (M&E) practices are culturally sensitive and effective when working with populations who may have experienced trauma? This is a critical question for international and cross-cultural evaluators, as a significant portion of programs worldwide serve individuals and communities facing complex challenges. I am Janice D’souza, Research & Evaluation Lead at the Institute of International Education (IIE). My background in evaluating international education and public health emergencies underscores the value of trauma-informed data collection.
In the world of M&E, data reigns supreme. It’s the compass guiding program improvement, the language of impact. Trauma-informed M&E builds upon this foundation, creating a more comprehensive understanding of program effectiveness by tailoring the approach to the unique needs of participants.
Many programs serve populations who have faced significant challenges – domestic violence survivors, refugees fleeing war, and children navigating troubled homes. M&E thrives on robust data collection methods. Trauma-informed M&E complements these methods by tailoring the approach to create a more comfortable and inclusive experience for a wider range of participants. Below are some tips to keep in mind as we collect data in a trauma-informed way.
Hot Tips
- Redefining Informed Consent
Trauma-informed M&E isn’t about a passive tick-box on a consent form. It’s about acknowledging the potential for triggering memories and fostering a safe space for participation. This means providing clear and concise explanations of the survey’s purpose, highlighting potentially sensitive topics, and offering participants the right to skip questions or withdraw entirely at any point. - Crafting Sensitive Language
The language we use matters. Replacing graphic details with neutral, respectful phrasing demonstrates an understanding of the potential impact of questions. Instead of “Have you ever been physically assaulted by a partner?” consider “Have you ever felt unsafe in a close relationship?” This shift minimizes triggering responses while still gathering valuable information. - Offering Choice in Format
Not everyone feels comfortable responding in the same way. Trauma-informed M&E recognizes this by offering surveys in multiple formats – online, by phone, or even written responses participants can submit anonymously. This empowers individuals to choose the most comfortable method and minimizes the risk of triggering responses in a pressured environment.
When working across cultures, language barriers and cultural stigma addressing trauma can pose additional challenges. Ensure culturally appropriate language using qualified translators and acknowledge that some cultures may be more hesitant to discuss past experiences. - Acknowledging Triggers
Forewarning participants about potentially sensitive topics demonstrates respect and allows them to prepare emotionally. This can be done through a brief introduction at the start of the survey or a separate information sheet. Additionally, providing resources for support services, such as crisis hotlines or mental health professionals, empowers participants to access help if needed.
Cultural adaptation is key to successful trauma-informed M&E in international settings. Involve community members in designing the data collection process to ensure it’s culturally sensitive. Consider alternative methods beyond surveys, such as focus groups or storytelling exercises, that may resonate better in certain cultures. - The Power of Opting Out
Trauma-informed M&E emphasizes participant autonomy. Participation should always be voluntary, with clear and accessible opt-out options readily available. Coercion, even subtle pressure, can exacerbate feelings of vulnerability and undermine the integrity of the data collected.
The Benefits of Trauma-Informed M&E
- Increased Trust and Honesty: Sensitive approaches create a safe space for participants to share their experiences authentically, leading to more reliable data.
- Reduced Bias: Trauma can lead to underreporting or skewed data. Trauma-informed methods mitigate this bias, resulting in a more accurate picture of program impact.
- Empowerment: When participants feel respected and heard, they’re more likely to engage fully with the process, leading to richer data and a sense of ownership over program improvement.
The American Evaluation Association is hosting International and Cross-Cultural (ICCE) TIG Week with our colleagues in the International and Cross-Cultural Topical Interest Group. The contributions all this week to AEA365 come from our ICCE TIG members. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this AEA365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the AEA365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an AEA365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to AEA365@eval.org. AEA365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators. The views and opinions expressed on the AEA365 blog are solely those of the original authors and other contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the American Evaluation Association, and/or any/all contributors to this site.