Hello my fellow evaluators. My name is Chris Lysy, and I am a freelance evaluator, designer, and trainer based in Cary, North Carolina. My consulting work involves helping organizations deal with the virtual shift (shifting programs from the “real world” to the “virtual world”).
Over the last couple of decades lots of organizations have evolved from being fundamentally place-based operations to global digital entities. An evolution that started well before COVID.
Yet for some reason we still have this image of an organization being a place where people who work together regularly come into face to face contact.
So why are your online efforts doomed to fail?
I believe we consistently underestimate how much the social environment has changed as the virtual world has grown.
- A 60 minute webinar is not the same as a 60 minute in-person brown bag.
- A virtual summit is not the same as a multi-day in-person conference.
- A 30 minute zoom chat is not the same as a cup of coffee with a colleague.
It’s similar, not necessarily better or worse, but different.
A lot of what has been written about evaluation capacity building is focused on what concepts to cover. It assumes that evaluators know how to effectively engage people at an organizational level. For the pre-virtual organization, that could mean showing up with free doughnuts in the lobby or hosting a large event in the “big conference room.”
But in order to bring the same level of change in the virtual world, we have to approach the capacity building challenge differently. Or else our efforts will be doomed to fail.
Capacity Building Requires Community Building
Most organizations are not full of vibrant virtual communities. IRL (“In Real Life”) when people get together, community happens. Not so in the digital world. People tend to know their teams (from regular Zoom calls) but they might not know anyone else outside their project bubble.
So if you want to engage a certain community of people (say project leaders or internal data people) you have to start by building that specific virtual community.
A Dead Forum is NOT a Community
Yes we all have lovely dreams of an active forum where people go to ask questions and support one another. But the reality is that good forum communities are hard to build and often require far more people than you even have in your organization.
A Webinar Lecture Series is NOT a Community
Somebody wants a community. So they create a webinar lecture series with topics of interest for that specific community. That might work for community building IRL but it doesn’t work the same online. Do this instead.
- Hold webinar conversations, not lectures.
- Source presenters from inside the prospective community.
- Hold panel webinars to distribute the content responsibility and increase exposure to peers.
- People need to see/hear people to connect, so encourage cameras/headsets (just don’t require them!).
An Email Newsletter is a Good Place to Start
It’s easy to create and just shows up in their email inbox (no need for them to visit a specific site or remember any kind of password/username). You can source newsletter content from the community and it pairs really well with a conversational webinar strategy.
Want more guidance?
I created a short practical guide.
You can download it here: Virtual Community Building 101 (https://freshspectrum.com/downloads/)
The American Evaluation Association is hosting North Carolina (NC) Evaluators Affiliate Week. The contributions all this week to aea365 come from NC Affiliate members. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to firstname.lastname@example.org. aea365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators. The views and opinions expressed on the AEA365 blog are solely those of the original authors and other contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the American Evaluation Association, and/or any/all contributors to this site.