LaRED TIG Week: Supporting Funded Partners With Monitoring or Evaluation Efforts by Noemi Avalos

I’m Noemi Avalos, Senior Evaluation Officer at Sierra Health Foundation (a private health conservation foundation) and The Center (a nonprofit organization). I am a proud immigrant from Mexico and daughter of hardworking parents who worked in various agricultural fields and showed me the value of la familia (family). In this role, I lead monitoring, technical assistance, learning, and evaluation efforts in partnership with program teams, funders, and external consultants; these efforts aim to generate useful information that supports decision-making for our staff, funders, and the organizations we invest in or funded partners (grantees).

LaRED TIG Week: Supporting Funded Partners With Monitoring or Evaluation Efforts by Noemi Avalos Read More »

Hot Tips + Rad Resources for Building Logic Models by David Howard

Hi, I’m David Howard, principal at DBH Consulting, a small firm partnering with nonprofits, foundations, and public agencies to strengthen how they use data, measure impact, and make strategic decisions. I am also an unabashed logic model enthusiast. Over two decades working in homeless services, child welfare, criminal justice, and workforce development, I’ve helped build or review more logic models than I can count — and have used them to teach dozens of graduate courses and train hundreds of practitioners. Here are a few Hot Tips I often share, plus one (free) Rad Resource I recently created and a couple more I have leaned on.

Hot Tips + Rad Resources for Building Logic Models by David Howard Read More »

Learning and Evaluation as Part of Grantmaking, Not Apart From It by Ava Yang-Lewis and Dana Jensen

We are Ava Yang-Lewis, Founder/Principal of ACT Research, and Dana Jensen, Program Director at the Carlson Family Foundation. Over the past several years, we have partnered to build and integrate an equitable evaluation approach into the Foundation’s grantmaking. Sharing learning is one of our values. While we have not systematically studied this approach (it might be in our future!), we’re writing this post to share a handful of learning and evaluation practices that have strengthened our grantmaking and made it more meaningful and impactful.

Learning and Evaluation as Part of Grantmaking, Not Apart From It by Ava Yang-Lewis and Dana Jensen Read More »

Facilitation Skills for Evaluators by Ann Price and Sheila B. Robinson

Hi! We’re Dr. Ann Price, founder and President of Community Evaluation Solutions, and Dr. Sheila B. Robinson, owner of Custom Professional Learning, LLC. Ann has spent 25+ years she has partnered with communities, coalitions, nonprofits, and foundations to design, implement, and evaluate programs across education, public health, youth development, and community coalitions, while Sheila brings more than 30 years’ experience designing and facilitating professional learning on a multitude of topics for educators, evaluators, and other professionals.

Facilitation Skills for Evaluators by Ann Price and Sheila B. Robinson Read More »

Sustaining Equity-Centered Evaluation: Reflections from the Field by Evan Gattozzi and Meghan Hunt

We’re Evan Gattozzi, Senior Project Manager with Informing Change, and Meghan Hunt, Senior Consultant with Engage R+D. Our two evaluation and learning firms have been working alongside the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation* to sustain and strengthen equity-centered evaluation. At a time of increasing injustice and ongoing threats to equity and equity-centered work, we’re also seeing important efforts to sustain practices and strengthen relationships among equity-centered practitioners and funders, which we want to share today.

Sustaining Equity-Centered Evaluation: Reflections from the Field by Evan Gattozzi and Meghan Hunt Read More »

Evaluation Data Reuse: Standardizing Evaluation When Reporting Back Research Results to Study Participants by Diana Rohlman, Taylor Vogel, and Francesca Germano

We are Diana Rohlman, Taylor Vogel, and Francesca Germano–toxicologists and evaluators at Oregon State University. Our lab conducts exposure science studies with community members to better understand what chemicals they are exposed to, and if those chemicals might be harmful. We are dedicated to ensuring that study participants have easy access to their data. The process of analyzing, preparing, and then giving people study results is called the report-back of research results, or RBRR.

Evaluation Data Reuse: Standardizing Evaluation When Reporting Back Research Results to Study Participants by Diana Rohlman, Taylor Vogel, and Francesca Germano Read More »

Clusters That Explain Themselves: Sorting Stories with LLM-Generated Criteria by Rick Davies

Hi! My name is Rick Davies, and I am an evaluator with a long-standing interest in people’s stories — about the past, as collected through the Most Significant Change (MSC) technique, and about the future, as generated through ParEvo and other foresight methods. Over the past year I have built a free browser tool for analysing them, and what I want to share is the method rather than the software.

Clusters That Explain Themselves: Sorting Stories with LLM-Generated Criteria by Rick Davies Read More »

OL-ECB TIG Week: Making Culture Visible: A Checklist for Evidence Use by Carmen Carrillo

Hello! I am Carmen Carrillo, a DrPH student at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and an evaluator with the County of San Diego’s Office of Evaluation, Performance, and Analytics.   During my DrPH practicum, I explored a question that may feel familiar to many evaluators: In times of change, how can we

OL-ECB TIG Week: Making Culture Visible: A Checklist for Evidence Use by Carmen Carrillo Read More »

OL-ECB TIG Week: Evaluating Science Education in Challenging Times by Monica Bruckner, Ashley Carlson, Ellen Iverson, Kristin O’Connell, and Kerry Vachta

We, are Monica Bruckner, Ashley Carlson, Ellen Iverson, Kristin O’Connell, and Kerry Vachta, the Evaluation & Education Research team at Carleton College’s Science Education Resource Center (SERC). We provide use-inspired evaluation, thought partnership, and support for programs and capacity building projects in, and beyond, higher education. We are excited to share some approaches that have

OL-ECB TIG Week: Evaluating Science Education in Challenging Times by Monica Bruckner, Ashley Carlson, Ellen Iverson, Kristin O’Connell, and Kerry Vachta Read More »