AEA365 | A Tip-a-Day by and for Evaluators

Dec/15

11

ACA TIG Week: Ivonne Chand O’Neal on the Use of Creativity Measures in Program Evaluation

My name is Ivonne Chand O’Neal, Co-Chair of the American Evaluation Association’s Arts Culture and Audiences Topical Interest Group (TIG) and Chief Research Officer at Creativity Testing Services (CTS), a research consulting firm specializing in the creation and validation of creativity assessments, and applications of creativity testing in corporate, educational, and artistic environments. In this role, one example of my work is to conduct evaluations of national performing arts centers throughout the U.S., examining such themes as board development, the impact of artistic programming on the American public, the development of exceptional talent, and the impact of the arts on students in PreK – 12 environments. Prior to my work with CTS, I evaluated creativity as Director of Research and Evaluation at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, Creativity Consultant with the Disney Channel, Director of Research at the David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, and as a Curator of the Museum of Creativity.

Lessons Learned: In a recent example of the application of metrics to assess creativity to inform artistic programming, my colleagues and I worked with artists in the Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater to understand the trajectory of artistic development to determine how to shape artistic programming for early elementary and middle school students at the Kennedy Center. We asked artists about such things as their interests and hobbies as children, the age they knew they had exceptional talent and skill, and the age their teacher/mentor/instructor put them forward in recognition of their exceptional talent and skill. Comparing the artists to an age-matched control group of performing arts center interns, we were surprised to find that at the critical age of 9 or 10, the artists dropped the majority of hobbies and interests common to elementary school-aged children, and focused solely on dance; while the control group continued to pursue interests in sports, music, dance, and science and math clubs. These types of findings are critical to arts programmers and educators alike as they seek to use their resources to provide the most cognitively and developmentally appropriate arts programming for elementary school students, as well as master classes and instruction for those young students with exceptional skill and ability.

Using Creativity Testing in evaluating programs is a focus that has recently emerged as a way to boost innovation and productivity in both non-profit and for- profit organizations. Stakeholders have been eager to add this component to existing evaluations as a way to foster a new way of approaching process and product-oriented work.

Hot Tip: Be bold and clear in offering new rigorous methods to assess impact in organizations with which you work. Stakeholders are often interested in finding a new approach to address uninspired or ineffective programming and look to the evaluation community for cutting edge options to address these concerns.

The American Evaluation Association is celebrating Arts, Culture, and Audiences (ACA) TIG Week. The contributions all week come from ACA TIG members. Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to aea365@eval.org. aea365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators.

No tags

2 comments

  • Kelly K Garcia · March 9, 2016 at 2:15 am

    Dear Mrs. Chand O’Neal,
    I am currently a student at Texas A&M University-Central Texas majoring in Psychology. I agree with you that creative and artistic approaches in evaluating educational and work environments are essential and can often be determinants of one’s personal success.
    The use of arts in school environments have been correlated to “gains in math, reading, cognitive ability, critical thinking, and verbal skill”. In work settings, the arts have demonstrated to “improve motivation, concentration, confidence, and teamwork” (Edutopia).
    In my work environment, I have personally experienced the positive impact of creative and artistic approaches. I switched departments within the same company. In the department that I first started in, the Assistant Vice President and Vice President constantly had artistic activities that helped to create a strong sense of teamwork and a very enjoyable work environment. This particular department had some of the highest sale drives every year and I do not think that a single individual could say they were unhappy with their job. I then moved to a new department, who still today struggles to keep up with meeting goals in mitigating potential risks to our institution. As you mentioned, it is an environment filled with “uninspired and ineffective programming”.
    It is important to implement these kind of approaches in such environments that will shape the lives our future generations. Hopefully one day we can see a stronger use of these approaches
    Sincerely,
    Kelly

    Smith, F. (2009). Why Arts Education Is Crucial, and Who’s Doing It Best. Retrieved March 09, 2016, from http://www.edutopia.org/arts-music-curriculum-child-development

    Reply

  • Module 2: Theory Driven Evaluation – Alishia Ellis · February 4, 2016 at 4:09 pm

    […] O’Neal, I. (2015, December 11). AEA365 | A Tip-a-Day by and for Evaluators. Retrieved February 04, 2016, from http://aea365.org/blog/aca-tig-week-ivonne-chand-oneal-on-the-use-of-creativity-measures-in-program-… […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

<<

>>

Archives

To top